La consolidación de la jep como baluarte en el proceso de paz colombiano

Abstract

The procedures that transitional justice entails immersed in an environment of political negotiatión as in the Colombian case, aimed at the end of an internal armed conflict, has an insuminous pressure between justice and peace, where there are constantly rising public debates about the role it plays the truth, in the comeback of armed conflicts. however, the truth is the reason, why they want to end the jep, disguise it with an impunity that does not exist, without going beyond the fact of denying an internal armed conflict as a precedent in the historical memory of our country, it is achieved understand that its objective is to make the implementation of the special justice for peace seem unnecessary. it is precisely there that the text itself contributes, and infers to change the paradigm that has been formed of the special justice for peace process, and although the country is in a situation of open conflict, we must consolidate it, make it the most expeditious path that today we have to reach peace, return to the center of what was created, which is to see justice as a right, that is, the right to have a restorative justice of resolution, which is reached through the truth, one of the four fundamental pillars of Transitional Justice, under the understanding that while the change of a stage of violent, tyrannical conflict towards stable, democratic peace, the rule of law and respect for individual and collective rights is taking place It should offer as the academic says (Orozco Abad, 2005) “all the truth and as much justice as possible” (p.97).