El tratamiento dogmático y jurisprudencial del delito político en el marco la justicia transicional implementada durante proceso de paz con las FARC-EP

Abstract

Political crime, which underlies the execution of the warlike or violent actions devised and perpetuated by the actors in the Colombian conflict, has been a reason for wide debate among political institutions that resort to legal, national and international principles or guidelines, in defense of Justice. However, the peace process with the FARC-EP has established a legal framework that establishes specific definitions and sanctions in response to these political tensions that arise within the context of the national conflict. This document tries to understand the limitations and legal scope of the definitions and sanctions established by transitional justice for political crime in the framework of the peace process with the FARC-EP; for which he resorts to the analysis and evaluation of 12 opinion and research articles in which the concepts and historical sanctions established in Colombia for said crime are studied, but above all, with regard to the adaptations of the constitutional and legal norm that are They have conceived at the same time as the signing and implementation of these agreements, emphasizing the positions in confrontation on these points of interest, seeking to clarify whether political crime, treated from the dogmatic and jurisprudential aspects of transitional justice, is implemented within the framework process of peace with the FARC-EP, in accordance with international legal principles but in response to the political-social realities of the nation