La jurisdicción especial para la paz y el derecho procesal civil Colombiano

Abstract

The special jurisdiction for peace presents different contradictions when harmonizing with civil procedural law. Thus, different gaps are generated when applying justice. Since ordinary justice establishes sentences for different crimes, the JEP stipulates different pardons for the same crimes that ordinary justice condemns. This writing concludes that it is necessary to examine the procedural components of the JEP in order to establish a legal framework that allows progress in the processes of reconciliation and social restoration. The special jurisdiction for peace presents different contradictions when harmonizing with civil procedural law. Thus, different gaps are used when applying justice. Thus, it is essential that the different jurisdictions and their processes be examined to impart justice in order to identify the contradictory aspects and to be able to solve the problems that are currently afflicting Colombian justice. It should be noted that for the elaboration of this work a qualitative method was used, making use of a tool called documentary analysis.