Máximas de la experiencia aportadas por la entomología forense, para el conocimiento privado del juez

Abstract

On the private knowledge of the judge, on the issues of due process and its impartiality in the evidentiary evaluation, there is a scant but important jurisprudential and doctrinal production that includes the system of sound criticism, impartiality and consistency, but nothing It has been produced academically with respect to the maxims of experience framed by knowledge of forensic entomology and its evidentiary assessment in the criminal case. This article is oriented to describe the basic knowledge in the area of forensic entomology, as a source of the rules of the experience of the judge who in his jurisdictional function dictates sentence in cases of criminal interest on homicides, whose victims have been found in a state of cadaveric decomposition.The contextualization and effects of this thematic axis are based on the support provided by forensic entomology to the criminal jurisdiction and the conceptual results obtained as judicial evidence, where corpses are found in a state of decomposition and skeletal reduction, in which the Judicial servants and the forensic doctors in charge of inspecting and analyzing them, fail to obtain valuable information on the chronothanatodiagnostic and the judge must include all this scientific knowledge in his maxims of experience to build his reasoning for the assessment of the expert evidence, for which The aim is to provide a practical method of compression of the criteria of criminal evidentiary validity of the forensic entomological test in the determination of the Postmortem Interval (IPM).