El preso con preacuerdo firmado no tiene derecho a libertad por vencimiento de términos

Abstract

This paper analyzes different edges that arise with the implementation of the new accusatory criminal system implemented since Law 906 of 2004, as the year of the aforementioned law indicates since 2004, the important role that pre-agreements play in judicial decongestion, of Faced with the impossibility of requesting the phenomenon of Freedom due to expiration of terms when the defendant signed a pre-agreement with the Attorney General's Office, but that has not been validated by a judge of the Circuit, whether specialized or not, it is negative in order jurisprudential flagrantly violates article number 13 of the constitution, the right to equality, since the defendant amen that he is agreeing with the Attorney General's Office, his situation has not been resolved, nor is it guaranteed that the judge validates the pre-agreement , budget in which the processing will be again in the initial position, that is, as if there had never been a pre agreement.